May 20, 2006


  • May 20, 2006

    Editorial

    Gambling on a Weaker Dollar



    For some time now, shortsighted lawmakers in Congress have been
    threatening China with tariffs for what they call its unfair currency practices.
    The Bush administration, to its credit, has generally resisted the protectionist
    rant, most notably by refusing to brand China a “currency manipulator” in an
    official report to Congress last week.


    China responded to the administration’s responsible policy and diplomatic
    courtesy this week when it loosened, a bit, the tether that binds the Chinese
    currency, the yuan, to the dollar. A stronger yuan implies a weaker dollar,
    as does the general strengthening so far this year of the euro and the yen.
    By making foreign goods sold here more expensive and American goods
    sold abroad cheaper, a weaker dollar would, in theory, eventually help
    reduce the United States’ huge trade gap.


    The problem is this: unless a falling dollar is paired with reductions in
    the federal budget deficit, it could do more harm than good by driving
    up interest rates, perhaps sharply. That’s because the foreign investors
    who finance the administration’s “borrow as you go” budget are likely
    to demand higher returns to invest in a depreciating dollar.


    But if budget deficits declined over the long run, the government’s
    reduced need to borrow would help keep interest rates low as the
    dollar depreciated. Then, after a lag, the falling dollar would shrink
    the trade deficit without risking big increases in interest rates in the
    process.


    Unfortunately, the incessant tax cutting of the past five years precludes
    any serious attempt to reduce the budget deficit. So to keep interest rates
    in check as the dollar falls, the administration would have to persuade
    investors not to believe what they see: a dollar that is declining even as
    the United States does nothing to curb its borrowing.


    That would be a difficult trick even for a Treasury Department that
    commanded respect. It will be especially difficult for Mr. Bush’s Treasury
    team, which has suffered a diminution of esteem and credibility.


    The Bush tax cuts also make it harder for Americans as a nation to bail
    themselves out of the trade deficit by saving more. Higher personal savings
    would allow the government to finance its budget deficit without outsized
    foreign borrowing — another safe route to a cheaper dollar and a smaller
    trade gap. But the Republicans who control Congress let a tax credit for
    low-income savers expire this year to free up room in the budget for nearly
    $70 billion in additional tax cuts for high-income Americans over the near term.


    That tax cut bill, signed into law this week by President Bush, also commits
    an estimated $53 billion through the middle of the century to help those same
    high earners shift their existing savings into tax shelters. This adds not one cent
    of new savings and presages big deficits far into the future.


    A weakening dollar, on top of intractable budget deficits and a chronic savings
    shortfall, is a recipe for recession. The question now is whether the country will
    change direction in time. The portents are not good.


     


    ————————————————————–


    ————————————————————–


     


     

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *